Body mass and Abdominal Profile Index in captive Hawaiian Geese

U Zillich, J Black

Abstract


It is often not practical or desirable to collect birds to assess their body
mass. The Abdominal Profile Index (API), developed by Owen (1981), is an
alternative method that can be used without capturing or collecting animals.
The weight and API scores (from 0 - 4 points) of captive Hawaiian
Geese Branta sandvicensis were recorded every two weeks for a year. API
was significantly correlated with mass and mirrored even minor changes
in this parameter. The corresponding mass change per half point on the
A P index was 85g for females and 115g for males during the non-breeding
season. This is equivalent to 4.0 % of the female and 4.8 % of the
male mean body mass during the non-breeding season.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ankney, C.D. 1984. Nutrient reserve dynam­ics of breeding and molting Brant. Auk101: 361-370.

Black, J .M., Deerenberg, C. & Owen, M. 1991. Foraging behaviour and site selec­tion of Barnacle Geese Branta leucopsis in a traditional and newly colonized spring staging habitat. Ardea 79: 349-358.

Black, J.M. & Owen, M. 1989. Agonistic behaviour in Barnacle Goose flocks: Assessment, investment and reproduc­tive success. Animal Behaviour 37: 199-209

Black, J . M., Prop, J., Fiunter, J., Woog, F., Marshall, A.P. & Bowler, J. 1993. Foraging performance of Hawaiian Geese. Report

No 15, Nene Recovery Initiative.

Bowler, J.M. 1994. The condition of Bewick's Swans Cygnus columbianus bewickii in winter as assessed by their abdominal profile. Ardea 82: 241 -248.

Boyd, H. & Fox. A.D. 1995. Abdominal pro­files of Icelandic Pink-footed Geese Anser brachyrhynchus -in spring. Wildfowl 46: 161-175.

Butler, P. J. 1991. Exercise in birds. Journal of Experimental Biology 160: 233-262

Ebbinge, B. 1989. A multifactorial explana­tion forvariation in breeding performance of Brent Geese Branta bernicla. Ibis 131: 196-204.

Freeman, S. & Jackson, W.M. 1990. Univariate metrics are not adequate to measure avian body size. Auk 107: 69-74.

Gauthier, G., Giroux, J.F. & Bédard, J. 1992. Dynamics of fat and protein reserves dur­ing winter and spring migration in Greater Snow Geese. Canadian Journal of Zoology 70: 2077-2087

Hobaugh, W. C. 1985. Body condition and nutrition of Snow Geese wintering in southeastern Texas. Journal of Wildlife Management 49: 1028-1037.

Kear, J. & Berger, A.J. 1980. The Hawaiian Goose. T & A Poyser, Calton.

Loonen, M., Zijlstra, M. & van Eerden, M. 1991. Timing of wing moult in Greylag Geese Anser anser in relation to the avail­

ability of their food plants. Ardea 79: 253-260.

Madsen, J. 1994/5. Impacts of disturbance on migratory waterfowl. Ibis 137: S37-S74.

Mayes, E. 1991. The winter ecology of Greenland White-fronted Geese Anser albifrons flavirostris on semi-natural grassland and intensive farmland. Ardea 79: 295-304.

Owen, M. 1981. Abdominal profile - a condi­tion index for wild geese in the field. Journal of Wildlife Management. 45: 227-230.

Owen, M. & Black, J.M. 1989. Factors affecting the survival of Barnacle Geese on migration from the breeding grounds. Journal of Animal Ecology 58: 603-617.

Prop, J. & Black, J.M. 1998. Food intake, body reserves and reproductive success of Barnacle Geese Branta leucopsis stag­ing in different habitats. Norsk Polarinstitut Skriften 200: 175-193.

Raveling, D.G. 1979. The annual cycle of body composition of Canada Geese with special reference to control of reproduc­tion. Auk 96: 234-252


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.